Site logo

FIA apologises for software glitch

NEWS STORY
04/10/2026

The FIA has apologised for a software glitch which affected a number of cars at the start of today's race.

The first sign that something was wrong was when pole-sitter Max Verstappen reported a lack of power during the formation lap.

A number of other drivers, including both Ferraris, suffered issues which either caused them to stop on track or drop down through the field.

They were all eventually able to make their way back to the pits for the restart almost an hour later, Race Control having abandoned the original start procedure.

The FIA subsequently issued an apology, as it confirmed that the glitch was down to the software issued to the teams.

"On the formation lap ahead of the Bahrain Grand Prix in Malaysia, an unprecedented combination of low engine speed, low-grip conditions, wet-weather energy management settings and the Sepang circuit's sector configuration led to an unintended loss of power for a number of cars," said the sport's governing body in a statement.

"As a result, the FIA Technical Department removed the energy limit constraint in the affected sectors through an updated software release distributed to all competitors during the race delay caused by heavy rain enabling teams to make the necessary changes to the power unit before the start of the race.

"This issue had not been detected by the FIA or the teams during testing or during the laps to the grid. The FIA, together with the teams and power unit manufacturers, will undertake a full review of the issue."

The issue follows the error by F1 at Monaco that led to the result of the Monaco Grand Prix being challenged numerous times, and represents another own goal in a season in which many see the sport as having lost its way with the drivers no longer in control of their cars, rather the cars in control of the drivers.

Once the field had made its way back to the pits, fans and viewers watched in disbelief as cars were pushed up and down the pitlane on order to get them in the correct order for the restart, while some, including Fernando Alonso questioned why those that stopped on track were allowed to continue.

"It's the first time I see it," said the Spaniard. "I had half of the races this year with DNF and we never stopped the race. I hope they can do it next time we stop."

The FIA's single-seater director, Nikolas Tombazi subsequently explained the issue in more detail.

"We didn't manage to test the software as extensively as we would have liked because there's been very little wet running this year," he said, according to Motorsport.com. "There was a bit of a combination of circumstances which caused this bug to kick in.

"Basically, on the formation lap, some cars went very slowly and almost came to a standstill," he continued. "There was a bit of a concertina effect between cars and some cars almost stopped completely. That bug prevented the power to be redeployed and for the cars to start again.

"It was mainly in some sectors where the full power was reduced," he explained. "I don't know exactly what speed that was, but some cars reaching this very low speed somehow entered into a loop, which meant they couldn't re-accelerate and then it looked as if they came to a stop.

"Not all cars reached the same low speeds on the formation lap," said Tombazis, when asked why only certain cars appeared to be affected. "There was a bit of a concertina effect. I think Max slowed down quite a lot, being at the front, and then some cars braked harder as they were surprised and so on. That caused some cars to experience the problem and some others to not experience it.

"Fortunately, our guys understood the issue very, very quickly. I think the update was done very competently. It was obviously a rush job. The priority was to get running as quickly as possible again, so I think the reaction time was quite fast. It wasn't a perfect job and, clearly, we didn't test the updates, but I think it was the way to handle such a case.

"In some of the sectors, some of these reductions of power were overridden," he revealed. "Clearly, we didn't have five days to do the updates. We only had a few minutes, but fortunately, I think we managed to do it without compromising any safety, any racing or fairness.

"The software was tested," he insisted. "It just wasn't tested in those specific conditions. What caught us out was the fact that cars went in that very, very low speed, which was not normally contemplated."

Asked why a scenario had not been anticipated, he repied: "Any bug is a product of a mistake. I mean, I don't know of any software that doesn't have bugs and updates. Your computer probably gets updated every three days and those are all bugs.

"Of course, anticipating these things is what one hopes to do, but sometimes some very combination of events isn't properly anticipated and causes the problem. I think if we had had a bit more testing, we probably would have managed to catch it in time and not to have such a situation.

"We would all like it to be simpler, but the fact is when you have as much electrical energy, it does make it more complicated," he admitted. "I think you appreciate that the race has now finished about one hour ago and we haven't done a full debrief of the situation to see how we can avoid such an issue.

"Every race, we have a long debrief afterwards where we identify criticalities. Obviously, that was a major criticality and we need to make sure we avoid it.

"Can I guarantee it will never happen again? This specific problem, yes. A problem, no. But we will do our best to avoid it, of course."

Luckily, we ended up getting a decent race. Had this not been the case, especially with so much unease already surrounding the regulations, heads might have needed to roll.

Check out our Sunday gallery from Sepang here.

LATEST NEWS

more news >

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images

POST A COMMENT

or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

 

1. Posted by marina170, 2 hours ago

"Tracks like Madring that turn out to be a snooze fest
Aero packages that look really stupid as they flip open and close
Hybrid engines that lose power and cause crashes
Software that causes cars to behave unexpectedly

You have to admit, f1 is so embarrassing now. Cars don’t need all these gadgets.
"

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by flyinglap, 3 hours ago

"This is a disgrace, this farce is unacceptable. Firstly, this “big brother” element of external (yet imbedded) control was never mentioned by the FIA, F1 and the teams. And apparently, even some (all?) of the drivers were unaware of its existence. Secondly, supposedly there is no traction control in Formula 1 because this is the pinnacle of motorsport and these are the best drivers in the world, yet we just learned that when it rains the power is limited by the FIA-mandated software. Why, precisely? Is it because the cars would be otherwise too difficult to drive? Therefore this is not any more a competition of driver skill. Or because of an actual risk of electrocution? Thirdly, I am wondering what kind of other FIA/Liberty controlled software is imbedded within the cars? Do they actually interfere with individual car performance on demand? This is a very serious issue. “Crashgate” seems like a joke in comparison. All this reminds me of the Milli Vanilli debacle. If it is proven that F1 is actually rigged on a grand scale, it may really be the straw that broke the camel’s back. "

Rating: Positive (3)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by Superbird70, 3 hours ago

"Do you think Woody still wants an FIA designed cooling vest after this?"

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by KKK, 4 hours ago

"The real question is "why is the FIA in charge of the software" it's madness, leave tge software uo title teams and engine manufacturers. It's ridiculous in having different team names, sanexengines abdxsane tyres. It's all so artificial. It's ruined F1 as we know it"

Rating: Positive (2)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

5. Posted by JamesD, 4 hours ago

"FIA = F***ing Incompetent A***holes"

Rating: Positive (3)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

6. Posted by ARL, 5 hours ago

"I am sure that a Domenicalli explanation of this exciting new fan entertainment feature will be issued shortly.

Unfortunately the "Secret Squirrel Turk Thrust Michael Masi Memorial Master Switch-Off" Software of unwanted championship contenders was only meant to be triggered in the closing laps of the final GP of the year.

It has of course been tested out on George's engine three times already this year without anyone spotting it."

Rating: Positive (3)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

7. Posted by Italian Job, 5 hours ago

"Utter madness.
I would vote to go back 40 years or so.
Free engines, free type of fuel, free tyres, free aero, no DRS type cheats, open budget.
The only rigid parameters to be:
Minimum weight;
Structural integrity in case of impact;
Maximum weight of fuel on board;
No launch control type software.

Would that happen? Unlikely.
Would Liberty approve? Never!
"

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

8. Posted by itc, 5 hours ago

"Time and time again, the FIA were told these engines wouldn't work. Every other Grand Prix or so, the world sees proof that these engines don't work. Bring back proper combustion engines next year, I'm sure Cosworth and Ferrari could build sufficient V8s and flat 12s. Otherwise, let's just have RC F1s and be done with it.
"

Rating: Positive (3)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

9. Posted by Chester, 5 hours ago

"Just unacceptable. It feels like the race is managed remotely. Did they also disable George's car? I am starting to doubt so much in F1."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page

X

Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2026. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms